Appellant's counsel stated lack of instructions; first appeal dismissed for want of prosecution by the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:50098
Court No. - 6
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 982 of 2012
Appellant :- Ram Naresh And Others Respondent :- Tilakram And Others Counsel for Appellant :- S.K.Mehrotra,I.D.Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Neeraj Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Ms. Shadma Shahi Advocate holding brief of Shri I. D. Shukla, learned counsel for the appellants submits that counsel for the appellants has no instructions in the matter, therefore, he is not in a position to assist.
In view of above, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 24.7.2024 Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Naresh And Others
Tilakram And Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
