Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as appellant failed to appear despite revised list call and sought no adjournment; interim order vacated.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:11067
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 77 of 2010
Appellant :- Raj Kishore Respondent :- Mazila And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Vivek Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- R.K.Saini
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
None is present on behalf of the appellant even in the revised list to press the appeal. There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Rajnish Kumar,J.)
Order Date :- 6.2.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Raj Kishore
Mazila
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
