Learned counsel for the appellant submits that one Sri Hari Narayan, who was the original tenure holder of the land in dispute had executed a Will in favour of three persons. Out of three, two died and their successors entered into License Agreement with the third person. Thereafter they sold their part to the said licensee. The third person executed a sale deed in favour of the appellant. Since there was interference in the possession of the appellant, the suit for permanent injunction was filed. Another suit for permanent injunction was filed by other person for 2/3rd portion of land, who had purchased from the aforesaid two persons. In both the cases, initially ad-interim injunction was granted. However, application for interim injunction was finally dismissed. The other has filed First Appeal No.193 of 2024, in which the notices have been issued. However, the same should have been F.A.F.O.