An appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear and no request for adjournment or pass-over was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 199 of 2012
Appellant :- Mohd. Yusuf Respondent :- Smt. Neelam Rawat And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Udai Pratap Singh Kushwah
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None appeared on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim Order, if any, stands vacated.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 23.11.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohd. Yusuf
Smt. Neelam Rawat
Rajnish Kumar
Haseenuddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
