The High Court held that an instant criminal revision reported as beyond time by 686 days requires issuance of notice to the opposite party no. 2 for delay condonation under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act. The case was listed as fresh for 16.10.2024.
Notice issued to opposite party no. 2 for delay condonation; case listed on 16.10.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(Item No. 782 out of 785 of list of fresh cases)
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 966 of 2024
Revisionist :- Sushil Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
In re: Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 1 of 2024
The instant criminal revision is reported to be beyond time by 686 days.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P.
Issue notice to the opposite party no. 2 on delay condonation application under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act.
List this case on 16.10.2024 as fresh.
Order Date :- 10.9.2024 Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay notice should be issued for a criminal revision delayed by over 686 days.
How to list a case as fresh after issuing notice for delay condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sushil Kumar Yadav
State of U.P.
Another
Sanjay Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
