Mohd. Waris v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court recorded the application for condonation of delay in a criminal revision. No applicant appeared. Notice was issued to the State for objections, and the matter was listed for hearing with conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 507 of 2024
Revisionist :- Mohd. Waris
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- Suchendra Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
(Order on C.M. Application No.2 of 2024 : Application for Condonation of Delay)
1. Case called out.
2. No one has appeared on behalf of the revisionist/ applicant, when the matter was taken up for hearing today.
3. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
4. Office report reveals that there is a delay of 443 days in preferring the instant criminal revision.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision for defectiveness be condoned beyond the limitation period.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd. Waris
Coram
Ajai Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLRD/507/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court