In a criminal revision, the High Court issued notice to respondent Nos. 2–4 on an application for condonation of delay and directed the prosecution counsel to file objections under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 15
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 155 of 2024
Revisionist :- Vijay Kumar Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Raghvendra P. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned Additional Government Advocate.
Issue notice to respondent Nos.2 to 4 on the application for condonation of delay, returnable at an early date.
List on 24.5.2024. In the meantime, learned Addl. Government Advocate shall file objections to the application under section 5 of Limitation Act.
Order Date :- 2.5.2024 kkb/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice should be issued to respondent Nos.2 to 4 on the application for condonation of delay?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Kumar Verma
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow And 3 Others
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
