Criminal revision against orders of the Juvenile Justice Board and appellate court in a 1983 murder case; counsel sought its connection with a pending 1987 criminal appeal. The court directed the revision to be listed before the appropriate Bench along with that appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 478 of 2024
Revisionist :- Ramesh Chandra Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
This revision has been filed by the revisionist to set aside the impugned order dated 08.06.2023 passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board, Sultanpur in Misc. Juvenile Case No. 23/2023 :State Vs. Gautam Pandey and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 82/1983, under Section 302, 307, 34 I.P.C., Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur and the judgment and order dated 06.02.2024 passed by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.13, Sultanpur in Criminal Appeal No. 98/2023: Ramesh Chandra Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and another.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that after conviction Criminal Appeal No. 392 of 1987: Rukundeo Alias Kabil has been filed, which is pending for final adjudication, thus this revision may be connected with Criminal Appeal No. 392 of 1987: Rukundeo Alias Kabil.
Accordingly, list this revision on the date fixed before appropriate Bench along with Criminal Appeal No. 392 of 1987: Rukundeo Alias Kabil.
Order Date :- 6.5.2024
Arvind
Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ramesh Chandra Pandey
State of U.P.
Another
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
