Juvenile X v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4599 of 2024
Revisionist :- Juvenile X Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Chandra Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
- Heard Sri Chandra Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State.
- Notice on behalf of the State of U.P./Opposite Party No. 1 has been accepted by the learned State counsel and on behalf of the opposite party no. 3 has been served in the office of the High Court Legal Services Committee.
- Issue notice to the opposite party no. 2 and 4 returnable four weeks. Steps be taken within a week.
- Opposite parties may file their respective counter affidavit, if any, within the said period. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
- List on 05.11.2024.
Order Date :- 17.9.2024 M. ARIF
Coram
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/4599/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court