Mewaram v. State of U.P.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4425 of 2024
Revisionist :- Mewaram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Rahul Yadav
Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
Sri Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Rahul Yadav, learned counsel for the revisionist appeared and requested for adjournment of the case as learned counsel for the revisionist is engaged elsewhere due to sickness of his mother.
LearnedAGA drawn the attention of the court to the fact that the informant has not been impleaded as opposite party in the array of parties.
List this case as fresh on 3.1.2025.
Order Date :- 11.12.2024 Kamarjahan
Digitally signed by :- KAMARJAHAN ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mewaram
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/4425/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
- Order 2 · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court