The Allahabad High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. as infructuous. The revision challenged an order summoning a doctor to record a statement, which was subsequently complied with, thereby removing the ground for the revision.
The criminal revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:142682
Court No. - 84
(Item No. 681 out of 725 of list of fresh cases) Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4234 of 2024
Revisionist :- Neelendra Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Madhu Tandon,Pratibha Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
therefore, the cause of this criminal revision has lost its efficacy.
Order Date :- 3.9.2024 Kashifa
Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision seeking recording of a statement has become infructuous upon compliance with the impugned order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Neelendra Kumar
Preeti Devi
State of U.P.
KASHIFA
Sanjay Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
