Arif and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision concerning separate living claim; counsel sought time to substantiate with evidence. Court granted two weeks to file supplementary affidavit and adjourned the case for fresh listing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4045 of 2024
Revisionist :- Arif And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Mazhar Ullah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the revisionists submits that it is the case of separate living of the revisionists, but he could not file the evidence to establish the fact of their separate living.
Learned counsel for the revisionists prays for and is allowed two weeks' time to file supplementary affidavit.
Put up this case as fresh on 18.10.2024.
Order Date :- 26.9.2024 Kashifa
Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arif
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/4045/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court