The revisionist challenged a maintenance order, arguing the opposite party received the property via a will. The court found prima facie force in this contention and stayed the impugned order pending consideration of the revision.
Operation and implementation of the impugned order dated 22.03.2023 was stayed till the next date of listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2949 of 2024
Revisionist :- Sanjeev Opposite Party :- Smt Mithlesh Devi Counsel for Revisionist :- Ram Chandra Sahu,Sanjay Kumar Pundir
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 3.12.2024 SFH
Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHIM HUSAIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether monthly maintenance is payable when the entire property was transferred to the applicant by registered will by the father.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjeev
Smt Mithlesh Devi
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
