Disposed
Mr X Juvenile v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCCRLR/1884/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Court No. - 64
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1884 of 2024
¶3
Revisionist :- Mr X Juvenile Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Karunesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anup Dhar Dubey,G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
¶5
- List revised.
¶6
- Heard Sri Amit Kumar Yadav, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Karunesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Anup Dhar Dubey, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.
¶7
- Learned counsel for the revisionist prays for two weeks' time to file rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit of the State. Prayer is allowed.
¶8
- Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 further prays for two weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Prayer is allowed.
¶9
- Learned counsel for the applicant will have a week's time thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit of the opposite party no. 2.
¶10
- List on 25.10.2024.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1884/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Siddharth
- Order 2 · Siddharth
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court