Mohd. Ibrahim v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1373 of 2024
Revisionist :- Mohd. Ibrahim
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- Jitendra Pratap Singh,Abhay Prakash Shukla,Saurabh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Notice on behalf of opposite party no.1 has been accepted by the office of learned A.G.A.
Issue notice to the opposite party no.2, returnable at an early date.
Steps be taken within a week.
List this case in the week commencing 16.12.2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohd. Ibrahim
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1373/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court