Revision against an unspecified order. Notice issued to one respondent. Pending revision shall not hinder recovery of arrears due against the revisionist.
Notice issued to opposite party No.2. Recovery of arrears to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1334 of 2024
Revisionist :- Islamuddin
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ajeet Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Issue notice to opposite party No.2, returnable at an early date.
3. Steps be taken within a week.
4. List this case in the week commencing 13.01.2025.
5. It is made clear that mere pendency of the instant criminal revision shall not come in the way of initiating any proceeding for recovery of any arrears against the revisionist, in accordance with law, if the same has become due.
(Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.)
Order Date :- 5.11.2024 cks/-
Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
