Vinod Kumar Pathak v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1251 of 2024
Revisionist :- Vinod Kumar Pathak Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Notice on behalf of State has been accepted by learned A.G.A.
Issue notice to opposite party no.2, returnable at an early date.
Steps be taken within a week.
List along with service report.
It is made clear that mere pendency of the instant criminal revision shall not come in the way of initiating any proceeding for recovery of any arrears against the revisionist in accordance with law, if the same has become due.
(Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vinod Kumar Pathak
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Ajai Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1251/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court