The High Court recorded that a charge sheet was filed against petitioners. No further order in the writ petition could be passed as the matter required time to consider the fresh charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4045 of 2023
Petitioner :- Prem Shankar Pandey And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohit Tiwari,Akhilesh Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ankit Singh,Vikas Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Case called out.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioners.
Learned A.G.A. is present on behalf of State/respondents.
Learned A.G.A., on instructions, states that in this case charge sheet has been filed in the Court on 09.08.2023.
In view thereof, no further order can be passed in the present petition.
The writ petition is consigned to record.
This of course is without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet or to take appropriate available remedy as per law.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Order Date :- 7.11.2024 Arjun/-
Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Prem Shankar Pandey
State Of U.P.
Vivek Chaudhary
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
