The High Court at Allahabad rejected an incomplete application for amendment in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 1349 of 2024, citing the omission to amend prayer clause (i).
Application for amendment rejected with liberty to file a fresh amendment application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1349 of 2024
Petitioner :- Narendra Giri And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, U.P. Govt. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
(C.M. Application No. Nil)
Sri Abhishek Misra, Advocate has filed Vakaltnama on behalf of opposite party no.4, the same is taken on record.
This is an application seeking amendment.
Heard.
The amendment sought is incomplete. Amendment is required in prayer clause (i) also but no such amendment has been sought. Accordingly, the application for amendment is rejected with liberty to file a fresh amendment application.
List in the next cause list as fresh.
(Narendra Kumar Johari,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 28.2.2024 Shanu/-
Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Narendra Giri And Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, U.P. Govt. Lucknow And Others
Rajan Roy
Narendra Kumar Johari
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
