Petitioner failed to appear and pursue the criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed in 2019. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution citing maxims on diligence and ending litigation.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:83346
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10743 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mohd. Danish Respondent :- Commissioner Faizabad Division Faizabad And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyanendra Kumar Pandey,Apoorv Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to their help and there should be end to litigation.
Order Date :- 12.12.2024 Anand/-
Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohd. Danish
Commissioner Faizabad Division Faizabad
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
