The petitioner, Syed Ali, did not appear to press his Criminal Misc. Writ Petition. The court noted they had lost interest and was not disposed of on merits, but dismissed it for non-prosecution. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1003333 of 2014
Petitioner :- Syed Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Principal Secy. Dept.Of Home Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Pandey,Om Prakash Vishwakarma,Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to their help and there should be end to litigation.
Order Date :- 16.12.2024 Mohit Singh/-
Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Syed Ali
State Of U.P. Through Principal Secy. Dept.Of Home
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
