Disposed
Islam v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Allahabad HCCRLA/3984/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3984 of 2024
Appellant :- Islam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Nripendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that due to inadvertence, the appellant could not implead the High Court Legal Service Authority, High Court Lucknow Bench, Lucknow and Child Welfare Committee through its Chairman as opposite parties. He, thus, prays for and is permitted to implead the High Court Legal Service Authority, High Court Lucknow Bench, Lucknow and Child Welfare Committee through its Chairman as opposite parties nos.3 and 4, respectively, during the course of the day.
Admit.
Summon the trial Court record.
Issue notice to opposite party nos.2 to 4, returnable at an early date.
Steps be taken within a week.
Let the objections be filed to the bail application within three weeks to which response, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
List in the week commencing 27.01.2025.
(Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.)
Order Date :- 18.12.2024 A.Dewal
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Islam
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another
Ajai Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court