This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3975 of 2024
Appellant :- Suman Kanaujiya Respondent :- Sonu Agarwal And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Vivek Sirswal,Mithila Shanker Awasthi
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant states that he may be permitted to implead the State as a party in the array of the opposite parties.
The prayer made for is allowed .
Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to implead the State as a party in the array of the opposite parties during the course of day.
Issue notices to the opposite party nos.1 and 2, returnable at an early date.
Steps be taken within a week.
List this case in the week commencing 10.02.2025 along with service report.
Order Date :- 18.12.2024 Mahesh
Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Suman Kanaujiya
Sonu Agarwal
2 Others
Ajai Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court