Anil Kumar Kashyap v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3347 of 2024
Appellant :- Anil Kumar Kashyap Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Counsel for Appellant :- Mukesh Kumar,Guddu Kumar,Narsingh Bahadur Singh,Pushpa Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent.
Admit.
Summon the trial Court record.
Let objection to the bail application moved on behalf of the appellant be filed within four weeks.
One week's time thereafter shall be available to learned counsel for the appellant to file response, if any.
List this case after expiry of aforesaid period.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anil Kumar Kashyap
- respondent
State Of U.P
Coram
Ajai Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/3347/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court