Dilip Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge bench held that the criminal appeal by the sole appellant abated because the appellant had expired, as reported by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Appeal No. 2704 of 2004 disposed of on account of abatement due to death of sole appellant.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:2029
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2704 of 2004
Appellant :- Dilip Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- I.P.Singh,Shrawan Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
As per report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur, dated 21.10.2023, the sole appellant in this case Dilip Singh has expired, thus, in view of the report by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur, dated 21.10.2023, this appeal stands abated. It is disposed of accordingly.
Let the file be consigned to records.
( Shamim Ahmed, J. )
Order Date :- 9.1.2024 A.Nigam
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dilip Singh
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/2704/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court