Appeal against a summoning order was disposed of by directing the trial court to expedite proceedings within 12 months without unnecessary adjournments, whilest staying coercive action against appellants pending disposal.
Direction to trial court to expedite disposal within 12 months; stay of coercive action against appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:142564
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2552 of 2024
Appellant :- Ramayan Yadav And 4 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Samar Nath Yadav,Sharad Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
not appearing even after service of notice or by way of calling counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit by the parties and as such, learned court concerned is hereby directed to expedite and finalize the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 16 of 2023, (Shakuntala Devi Vs. Ramayan Yadav and others), under Section 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)Da, 3(1)Dha of SC/ST Act, P.S. Dhanghata, District Sant Kabir Nagar, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 12 months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order before him without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
Order Date :- 3.9.2024 #Vik/-
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramayan Yadav and 4 Others
State of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
