Disposed

Natthi v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC15 Jul 2024CRLA/2451/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the criminal appeal seeking quashing of a summoning order under the SC/ST Act and IPC, directing the trial court to finalize the special complaint proceedings expeditiously within 12 months without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to trial court to expedite and finalize special complaint proceedings within 12 months; no coercive action against appellant pending disposal.

Natthi vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:113567

¶2

Court No. - 83

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2451 of 2024

¶4

Appellant :- Natthi Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Kalyan Sundram Srivastava,Satyam Shivam Sundaram Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Gaurav Srivastav,Seemi Siddiqui

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant appeal has been filed for seeking quashing of the summoning order dated 02.12.2023 passed by learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Mathura in Special Complaint No.73 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)da, 3(1)dha of SC/ST Act, P.S. Chhata, District- Mathura.

¶8

Learned counsel pressed all the grounds whatsoever has been taken through the instant criminal appeal through which, it has been apprised that there is hardly any attraction of sections in which the appellant has been summoned and all these grounds have not been taken into consideration while passing the order dated 02.12.2023.

¶9

Per contra, learned counsel for respondent no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as made in the appeal on the ground that summoning order has been passed after considering the material available on record.

¶10

Be that as it may, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the matter pending by way of calling counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit by the parties and as such, learned court concerned is hereby directed to expedite and finalize the proceedings of Special Complaint No.73 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)da, 3(1)dha of SC/ST Act, P.S. Chhata, District- Mathura, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 12 months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order before him without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶11

Learned counsel for appellant assures on behalf of the appellants that they will fully cooperate with the learned trial court concerned for expeditious disposal of the said special complaint case.

¶12

However, it is made clear that till the disposal of the proceedings of the aforementioned special complaint case, no coercive action shall be taken up against the appellant herein.

¶13

The instant appeal stands disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 15.7.2024 Saif

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Natthi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Natthi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek @ Tandan @ Aryan Maurya vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Naresh Yadav and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Mumtaz and 2 Others vs State of Up

Ashu and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Virendra Yadav @ Vicky vs State of U.P. and Another

Surendra Singh and 5 Others vs State of Up and Another