Criminal appeal against a summons order in an SC/ST Act complaint case. The court did not quash the summoning order but directed the Special Judge at Amroha to expedite and finalise the complaint case within a year, with no coercive action against the appellants until disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:135969
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 230 of 2024
Appellant :- Pramod And 3 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Sunil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mayank Mishra
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
No.82 of 2023 (Smt. Kuntesh Jatav vs. Ravindra Bhati and Others), P.S. Hasanpur, District- Amroha and expedite and finalize it preferably within a year from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order before him without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
Order Date :- 23.8.2024 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the summoning order dated 29.11.2023 under IPC and SC/ST Act sections should be set aside.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Pramod And 3 Others
State of U.P.
Mayank Mishra
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
