Convicted appellant sought suspension of sentence and bail during pendency of appeal in a POCSO case. The court noted his absence of criminal history and the unlikelihood of early appellate hearing, and released him on bail on personal bond with two sureties without touching the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1833 of 2024
Appellant :- Dharmendra @ Dabloo Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Awadhesh Kumar Sharma,S.P. Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order on Application u/s 389(1) Cr.P.C
Case Crime No. 04 of 2018, under Sections 354 IPC, Section 7/8 POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station- Trilokpur, District- Siddharth Nagar on his furnishing personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Order on Appeal
Order Date :- 25.7.2024 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant convicted under Sections 354 IPC and 7/8 POCSO Act should be enlarged on bail during pendency of his appeal.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Dharmendra @ Dabloo
State Of Up
Opposite Party No. 2 (Informant)
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
