The Apex Court dismissed the criminal appeal as it stood abated because the sole appellant, Raj Kumar Sharma, had expired during the pendency of the appeal. The trial court record was directed to be sent back to the relevant court.
The appeal was deemed to have abated; trial court record to be sent back to the concerned court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:48049
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1096 of 2005
Appellant :- Raj Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Sushil Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
As per report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow dated 09.07.2024, the sole appellant, Raj Kumar Sharma had already been expired during pendency of the appeal.
In view of the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow dated 09.07.2024, the instant appeal stands abated.
Trial court record, if any, be sent back to the court concerned.
Consign to record.
Order Date :- 16.7.2024 Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Raj Kumar Sharma
State of U.P.
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
