Atul Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lucknow and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Criminal Appeal was admitted and listed. The trial court record was summoned. Notice was issued to respondents no.2, 3, and 4, noting request for confidential service to respondent no.2.
What the court decided
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1086 of 2024
Appellant :- Atul Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lucknow And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Suresh Chandra Srivastava,Vaibhav Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
- Heard Shri Suresh Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
- Admit.
- Summon the record of the trial court.
4 . List on 18.4.2024.
- It is informed by learned AGA that respondent no.2 has not been served at their end.
- Thus, issue notice o respondents no.2, 3 and 4 returnable till the next date of listing.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue notice to respondent no.2 while maintaining confidentiality of their identity.
Whether to keep the matter for further hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Atul Kumar Sharma
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/1086/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shailendra Kumar Shukla vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Ram Pravesh vs State of U.P Thru. Secy. Legal Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Anohter
Khaderu @ Jang Bahadur vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.
Imtiyaz Ahmad Khan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another