High Court dismissed a civil revision application as it was not pressed by the learned counsel for the revisionists; interim orders were vacated if any existed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:17308
Court No. - 5 Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 58 of 2013 Revisionist :- Raghu Bansh Singh And Another Opposite Party :- Smt.Saumya Singh And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Kapil Muni Dubey,Dhirendra Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ganesh Kumar Gupta,Siddharth Gupta
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Heard.
Shri Kapil Muni Dubey, learned counsel for the revisionists states that he does not want to press the instant revision and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.2.2024 J.K. Dinkar
Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Abdul Moin
Jeshu Kumar Dinkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
