The Court dismissed a contempt application as infructuous due to the lapse of time, also discharging the contempt notices issued.
The contempt application was dismissed as infructuous and the contempt notices were discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:5357
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 903 of 2016
Applicant :- Shishu Pal Singh Opposite Party :- Saumya Agarwal Diatrict Magistrate Unnao And Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Virendra Kumar Dubey
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the petitioner, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that by the efÒux of time, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous .
Contempt notices are hereby discharged.
If the petitioner feels that the cause of action still survives, he may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.
consigned to record.
Order Date :- 18.1.2024 AKS
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shishu Pal Singh
Saumya Agarwal and District Magistrate Unnao and Ors.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
