In a contempt application challenging noncompliance of a prior judgment, the single judge directed the respondent to appear and explain the lack of compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4840 of 2024
Applicant :- Uma Kant Mishra Opposite Party :- Smt. Mirdul Anand, Distt. Inspector Of Schools, Balrampur And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Yogendra Kumar Mishra,Ajeya Mishra
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Issue notice to the respondent to explain as to why the contempt proceedings may not be initiated against him for noncompliance of the judgement and order dated 20.09.2024 passed by this Court in Writ-A No.8164 of 2024.
As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, seven working days time is granted for taking steps.
List this case in the week commencing 10.02.2025 as fresh.
Office is directed to submit the service report by the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 20.12.2024 S. Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Uma Kant Mishra
Smt. Mirdul Anand
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
