This single-paragraph order grants an application for notice in a contempt matter. The court directed the office to issue notice to the respondent to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for alleged disobedience of a judgment passed in Writ C No. 7895 of 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4754 of 2024
Applicant :- Pushpa Yadav Opposite Party :- Ram Chandra The Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Viddut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Barabanki And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Durgendra Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Issue notice to respondent no. 1 to explain as to why contempt proceedings be not initiated against him for alleged willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 12.09.2024 passed in Writ C No. 7895 of 2024.
As prayed, steps be taken within seven days.
List this case in the week commencing 10.02.2025, as fresh.
Office is directed to submit service report by the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 18.12.2024 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Pushpa Yadav
Ram Chandra The Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Viddut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Barabanki
Another
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
