The court issued a notice to the respondent to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for alleged willful disobedience of a previous order passed in a writ petition. Steps were directed to be taken within seven days.
Notice issued to respondent within seven working days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4737 of 2024
Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Opposite Party :- Sri Sashi Kant Singh Senior Superintendent Jail Adrash Karagar Lucknow
Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Tripathi
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Issue notice to respondent to explain as to why contempt proceedings be not initiated against him for alleged willful disobedience of the order dated 10.09.2024 passed in Writ A No. 6458 of 2024.
As prayed, steps be taken within seven working days.
List this case in the week commencing 10.02.2025, as fresh.
Office is directed to submit service report by the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 17.12.2024
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice should be issued to the respondent explaining why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for alleged willful disobedience of an order.
Vinay Kumar
Sri Sashi Kant Singh
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
