C.A. No. 3523 of 2018. Applicant sought contempt against opposite party for alleged non-compliance of writ court order. Court accepted affidavit of compliance showing possession of shop and payment of rent, dismissing the application.
Contempt application dismissed as compliance with the previous order of the Writ Court has been admitted by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:39469
Court No. - 8
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3523 of 2018
Applicant :- Suraj Pal Opposite Party :- Ramratan Gupta Counsel for Applicant :- Puneet Kumar Verma,Ashish Pandey,Dhruvendra Pratap,Vijay Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Chandra Bhushan Pandey,D.P.Singh,Pankaj Kumar Srivastava,Pankaj Tewari
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 24.5.2024 V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a violation of writ court order was established despite the tenant's claim of compliance.
Suraj Pal
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
