Contempt application alleging non-compliance of a writ court order. Standing counsel stated compliance was effected; no petitioner present. Court found no contempt made out, discharged notices, dismissed the petition, and left the applicant free to seek redress in an appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:11744
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2388 of 2021
Applicant :- Kapil Dev Mishra Opposite Party :- Som Mishra Sub Divisional Magistrate Sadar Pratapgarh Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Mishra,Vijay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sunil Bajpai
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Order Date :- 8.2.2024 Mayank
Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt was made out given the State's submission that the writ court order had been complied with.
Kapil Dev Mishra
Som Mishra Sub Divisional Magistrate Sadar Pratapgarh
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
