Yogendra Singh v. Sri a. Sudhan, Chief Development Officer Distt. Barabanki
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt application, the applicant challenged the respondent authority for rejecting his representation on 8.5.2024 without considering the mandatory report of the Chief Development Officer. The court dismissed the application, holding it misconceived because the non-compliance stemmed from the antecedent writ order directing the authority to act within specific terms.
What did the court decide?
Contempt application dismissed as misconceived. Applicant directed to challenge the antecedent order of rejection before the competent court.