In a contempt application where the petitioner was absent, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous due to the lapse of time and discharged the contempt notices.
The contempt application is dismissed as going stormy. The contempt notices are discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:9716
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1574 of 2016
Applicant :- Yogesh Kumar And 2 Ors. Opposite Party :- R.K.Bansal Executive Engineer Electricity Division And 3 Ors.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pradip Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Amit Kr.Singh Bhadauriya
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case called out.
None present for the petitioners, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
It seems that by the efÒux of time, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The contempt notices are hereby discharged.
If the petitioners feel that the cause of action still survives, they may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks.
consigned to record.
Order Date :- 1.2.2024 AKS
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yogesh Kumar And 2 Ors.
R.K.Bansal Executive Engineer Electricity Division And 3 Ors.
Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
