Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia, J., allowed bail application filed by Ramu in FIR No.263 of 2024 under Section 70(1) BNS, considering co-accused had been enlarged and applicant had no Criminal antecedents.
The applicant was released on bail by furnishing personal bonds and two sureties of Rs.20,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:64604
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9958 of 2024
Applicant :- Ramu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2 . The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.263 of 2024, under Section 70(1) BNS, Police Station Shivgarh, District Raebareli.
3 . It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the co-accused Rohit Kumar has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders passed today.
4 . Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the co-accused on similar allegations has been enlarged on bail vide orders passed today in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9848 of 2024 coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 14.07.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .
6. Let the applicant Ramu be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 19.9.2024 akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in case of occurrence after the commencement of the new law
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9848 of 2024Distinguished¶8
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramu
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
Ashok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
