Allowed

Suhel Khan @ Baba v. the State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Allahabad HC5 Sept 2024BAIL/9516/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail to applicant on grounds of parity with a co-accused released on similar charges, noting lack of criminal antecedents and lengthy incarceration since mid-June 2024.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bonds and two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each subject to conditions to attend hearings, not commit similar offences, or interfere with investigation.

Suhel Khan @ Baba vs the State of U.P. Thru… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:61107

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9516 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Suhel Khan @ Baba Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Chetan Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2 . The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.80 of 2024, under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC, Police Station Naveen Modern Police Thana, Shrawasti, District Shrawasti.

¶8

3 . It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on the same allegation, the co-accused Taarif has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 30.08.2024.

¶9

4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶10

5. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who has been enlarged on bail coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 30.06.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Suhel Khan @ Baba be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 5.9.2024 akverma

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Suhel Khan @ Baba v. the State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suhel Khan @ Baba v. the State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajesh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Mohd. Ishrail Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Vijay Srivastava @ Pawan Srivastava Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Sahajaram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.Home Lko. and Another

Smt. Shobha Yadav vs Additional Principla Judge Family Court IInd Unnao and another

Suraj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others