Allowed

Amir v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Allahabad HC4 Sept 2024BAIL/9450/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court (Allahabad) allowed a bail application filed under the U.P. Gangsters Act. The court was persuaded by the argument that the applicant had already been granted bail in other related cases and presented himself as a flight risk neither.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each.

Amir vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:60849

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9450 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Amir Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Raman Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.291 of 2024 under section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Maholi, District Sitapur.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that two cases have been shown in the Gang Chart, in which the applicant has been granted bail. Other than that, the applicant has also been implicated in other eleven cases and in all the case, he is also on bail. The applicant is in jail since 22.07.2024. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases shown against him, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Amir be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶13

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

Order Date :- 4.9.2024 VNP/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Amir v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amir v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shyamu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Kamla Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Meraj Sai Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko.

Kamlesh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko

Kamlesh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Sandeep Rastogi @ Raj Abhishek vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.