Allowed

Ramashankar @ Ramshankar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Allahabad HC3 Sept 2024BAIL/9391/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad allowed a bail application filed by Ramashankar @ Ramshankar in a criminal case involving cheating and forgery, considering him a fit case for bail on lack of criminal history and co-accused release.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount.

Ramashankar @ Ramshankar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. — Allahabad HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:60447

¶2

Court No. - 14

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9391 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Ramashankar @ Ramshankar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary,Israr Siddiqui,Ranveer Singh

¶5

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶7

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.

¶8

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is neither seller nor purchaser. He is not even a marginal witness.

¶9

3.The co-accused Rajesh Jaiswal who was assigned similar role has been granted bail vide order dated 25.7.2024 passed by this Court in Bail No.8028 of 2024. The offence is triable by Magistrate. The applicant has no previous criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 29.6.2024.

¶10

It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶11

4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the sale deed has been executed in favour of Mayawati, wife of the present applicant.

¶12

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the applicant has no criminal history, the offence is triable by Magistrate, the co-accused Rajesh Jaiswal has been granted bail by this court, the applicant is neither seller nor purchaser or a witness in the sale deed, arguments advanced by learned

¶13

counsel for the parties, the period for which the applicant is in jail and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail.

¶14

6. Let the applicant Ramashankar alias Ramshankar, involved in Case Crime No.30 of 2024 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Harraiya, district Balrampur, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶15

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶16

(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶17

(iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶19

(v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

(vi) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial

¶21

and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶22

7. The application is allowed accordingly.

¶23

Order Date :- 3.9.2024 kkb/

¶24

Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ramashankar @ Ramshankar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramashankar @ Ramshankar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Rupa Samajdar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Mamta Sinha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Firoj Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another

Md. Nadeem Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko

Jairam Rajpoot vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home

Padma Jaiswal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another