Allowed

Arbi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC24 Jan 2024BAIL/847/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the criminal miscellaneous bail application of an accused charged under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, noting he was already granted bail in all other cases against him and posed no flight or witness-tampering risk.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with standard conditions.

Arbi vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:7192

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 847 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Arbi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.206 of 2022 under section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Sadarpur, District Sitapur.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the sole case shown in the Gang Chart, the applicant has been granted bail. Other than that, the applicant has also been implicated in other cases and in all the cases, he is also on bail. Copies of the bail orders are annexed with the supplementary affidavit. The applicant is in jail since 15.07.2022. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases shown against him, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Arbi be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶13

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

Order Date :- 24.1.2024 VNP/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Arbi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Satya Prakash Mishra Alias Rahul Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. U.P. Lko.

Ravendra Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Priya Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Santosh @ Sandeep Vs State of U.P.

Vinod Kashyap Vs State of U.P. Thru.Its Prin. Secy. H. and 3 Ors.

Shiv Nandan Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Civil Secrt. Lko.