Allowed

Javed v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC9 May 2024BAIL/4877/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge High Court allowed a bail application filed by Javed under the U.P. Gangster Act. The court noted the applicant's prior bail grant in other cases and his undertaking to cooperate in trial, deciding to release him on personal bond and sureties with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Javed released on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions regarding court attendance, absence from India, and no misuse of liberty.

Javed vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:35786

¶2

Court No. - 11

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4877 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Javed

¶5

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Bahar Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, the same is taken on record.

¶9

As per learned counsel for the applicant, the present applicant is in jail since 04.04.2024 in Case Crime/ FIR No.176 of 2024, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station - Hargaon, District - Sitapur.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that against the present applicant, only two cases have been indicated in the gang chart (Annexure No.2) in which the applicant has been granted bail. The bail orders have been enclosed as Annexures No.3 & 4 to the bail application. Besides, there is one other case against the applicant, in which he has also been enlarged on bail by the learned court below and the bail order has been annexed with the supplementary affidavit filed today. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that the present applicant has not misused the liberty of bail so granted to him and detention of the present applicant under Gangster Act is unwarranted. He has further submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case as he has not committed any offence as alleged. Further, the applicant undertakes that he shall not misuse the liberty of bail, if so granted by this Court and shall abide by all terms and conditions of the bail order and shall cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has, however, opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

Without entering into merits of the issue; considering the arguments of learned counsel for the parties; contents and allegations of the FIR; the fact that two cases have been shown against the present applicant in the gang-chart in which he has

¶13

been granted bail; in one other case also, the applicant has been granted bail and undertaking of the applicant that he shall cooperate in the trial proceedings and shall not misuse the liberty of bail, I find it appropriate to release the applicant on bail.

¶14

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶15

Let applicant- Javed be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶16

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶17

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶20

(v) The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶21

[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]

¶22

Order Date :- 9.5.2024 RBS/-

¶23

Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Javed v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Javed v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mahendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Nimmo Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home

Neelam Yadav Vs State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Arvind Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Suraj Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Deptt.

Javed Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.