Allowed

Naushad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC27 Apr 2024BAIL/4640/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted bail to the applicant in a murder and rioting case on the ground of parity, as co-accused with identical roles had already been granted bail by the same court. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions ensuring attendance and non-interference with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail upon furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties subject to conditions.

Naushad vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:33163

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4640 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Naushad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶7

The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.0856 of 2019 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 364, 307, 302 I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is in jail since 27.11.2019. He further submits that only general allegations have been levelled against all the accused persons. He further submits that co-accused, Javed & Akram, having identical role, have already been granted bail by this Court, vide orders dated 1.4.2024 & 23.4.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.1540 of 2023 & 9135 of 2023 (bail orders provided by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record). In these circumstances, the applicant is also entitled for bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer of the applicant for grant of bail, but he conceded the fact that co-accused co-accused, Javed & Akram have already been granted bail by this Court.

¶10

Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for parties, material available on record, contents of the F.I.R., other relevant documents,

¶11

bail order of the co-accused, Javed & Akram, ground of parity as well as totality of fact and circumstances, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶12

Let applicant - Naushad - be released on bail in aforesaid Case Crime, on his furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-

¶13

(i) The applicant shall not commit or participate in any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶14

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.

¶17

(v) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC.

¶18

(vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3)

¶19

recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶20

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶21

Order Date :- 27.4.2024 Gaurav/-

¶22

Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Naushad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naushad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dravin Kumar Singh Vs Deepak Kumar, Prin.Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Azad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko.

Munesh Prasad Vs Dr. Mahendra Pratap Singh, Dist. Inspector of Schools, Lakhimpur Kheri and Another

Ram Sahai Vs Bholendra Pratap Singh, Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Ambedkar Nagar

Raj Kumar Singh and Others Vs Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. (Horticulture and Food Processing) and Anr.

Naushad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dept. Home Lko.