Allowed

Salman v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.

Allahabad HC22 Feb 2024BAIL/1740/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous bail application was filed under sections 147 IPC, 302 IPC, etc. The applicant sought bail citing parity with a co-accused whose bail was previously granted by the same court. The court concluded that parity existed given the similarity of roles, leading to the allowance of the bail application.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail subject to a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount with conditions to attend hearings and not interfere with evidence.

Salman vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:15790

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1740 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Salman Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Yadav,Naved Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record.

¶7

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Wali Nawaz Khan, learned counsel who appears for the informant as well as learned AGA and perused the record.

¶8

3. The accused-applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.0295 of 2023 under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 120-B IPC and Section 7 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Sultanpur.

¶9

4. It is argued that the role assigned to the applicant was similar to that of co-accused who has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 06.02.2024 passed in Bail No.1009 of 2024. As regards the criminal antecedents, the same is duly explained in the supplementary affidavit filed today.

¶10

5. Considering the present case and the fact that the specific role of firing was assigned to one Siraj, the co-accused, and considering the similarity of role of applicant with the coaccused who has been enlarged on bail by this Court, the applicant is entitled for the bail on the ground of parity. Thus the bail application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Salman be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

7. It is, however, directed that the trial shall be concluded with all expedition.

¶16

Order Date :- 22.2.2024 nishant

¶17

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Salman v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salman v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vishal Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Deptt. of Home, Lucknow

Dheeraj Pandey Vs State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow

Virendra Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko

Mohsin Raza Vs State of Up. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Sadhna Bajpai Vs State of U.P., Thru. Prin. the Secy. Home Deptt., Civil Secrtt. Lko.

Salman Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.