Harshit v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCBAIL/12625/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order scheduled an objection/counter affidavit from a non-appearing party before deciding the criminal miscellaneous bail application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 11
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12625 of 2024
¶3
Applicant :- Harshit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Pal Singh,Ambrish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
¶5
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. Sudha Sharma, learned AGA for the State.
¶6
- Learned AGA has informed that notice has been given to opposite party no.2 on 19.11.2024 but no one has appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2. It appears that one opportunity should be given to opposite party no.2 to file objection/ counter affidavit.
¶7
- Let objection/ counter affidavit be filed within a period of four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a period of one week thereafter.
¶8
- List in the week commencing 13.01.2025 within top ten cases.
¶9
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
¶10
Order Date :- 5.12.2024 RBS/-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Harshit
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko.
- respondent
3 Others
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/12625/2024
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shatrohan @ Shatrughan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.
Anil Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.
Sandeep Kumar Verma Vs the State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others
Alok Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another