Suraj Kashyap v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12073 of 2024
Applicant :- Suraj Kashyap Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pradyumn Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
- Heard Sri Pradyumn Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Nikhil Singh, learned AGA for the State.
- Learned AGA has informed that notice has been given to opposite party no.2 on 09.11.2024 but no one has appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2. It appears that one opportunity should be given to opposite party no.2 to file objection/ counter affidavit.
- Let objection/ counter affidavit be filed within a period of three weeks.
- List in the week commencing 16.12.2024 within top ten cases.
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 20.11.2024 RBS/-
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Suraj Kashyap
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Coram
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/12073/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rahul Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
Bilal Ahmad and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Aquib Nasim vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home
Hanumandutt Tiwari and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another